Soil nutrients may not always be available in adequate amounts for optimal crop production. Supplying the necessary nutrients can boost crop production and help minimize the risk of loss of nutrients to the surrounding environment.
Farmers are being encouraged to use best management practices (BMPs), and legislation is cracking down on the issue. Certain areas can be focused on to receive fast results from BMP efforts.
According to Patrick Troy, regional specialized agent for row crops for University of Florida/Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Extension, focusing on a more efficient nutrition application is key. Troy suggests that growers “really need to know how much their crop needs.” He stated that a lot of times farmers will overuse or underuse, because they distribute applications that are based off of generalized numbers. Research on nutrient application is extremely valuable for educating farmers on the effects of nutrients on their crops. But, each crop is different based on the known soil nutrient levels, so that always needs to be taken into account.
“The optimal yield input is different from the economicallyefficient applications. The research does try to look at things in a practical perspective, and tries to encourage growers to be efficient and good stewards of those resources,” says Troy.
One way for growers to take into consideration how much nutrient application is enough is to stick to the “4 Rs of Fertilizer Management.” The full article can be found on the University of Florida’s Electronic Data and Information Source website. Following is an excerpt from the article.
“Selecting the right source of fertilizer or the right material to deliver the nutrients is important. The right source can be related to the following questions:
- What source of nutrient(s) would be the least expensive per unit of delivered nutrient?
- Should an organic source (compost or manure) of nutrient be considered?
- When is a controlled-release fertilizer the right source?
- What sources can simultaneously deliver more than one needed nutrient?
- When should a liquid form be used instead of a dry form?
- When should the salt index of the fertilizer be considered in selecting the right source?
The right source often involves the ease of application of a nutrient and cost per unit of nutrient. In addition, efficiency of nutrient use may be considered. For example, a controlled-release nitrogen source may be preferred to deliver small amounts of nutrients throughout the growing season, instead of larger amounts of nitrogen delivered in a few side-dressings from a soluble source.
The right source may be manure, if the farmer would like to take advantage of the organic matter supplied along with the plant nutrients. The organic matter may increase the water-holding capacity and nutrient supply of the soil.
Crops require a certain amount of plant nutrients for production of profitable crops. Part of this nutrient quantity can be supplied from the soil, and the remainder must come from fertilizer, either synthetic sources or organic forms (such as livestock wastes composts) or green manure crops. The first key to practicing the right rate concept is soil testing (see EDIS publication SS621, Soil Testing for Plant-Available Nutrients—What Is It and Why Do We Use It?). Before the crop is planted and any fertilizer has been applied, soil testing can help determine the portion of the crop nutrient requirement that is already available from the soil. Using a strong research information base, the recommendation for the right rate of fertilizer can be made from the soil test result.
The right rate refers to the amount of fertilizer needed for the crop production season and is based on extensive research over locations, crops, varieties, and years. The right rate also refers to the amount of fertilizer applied at one time in the growing season. For example, the farmer needs to know, depending on the cropping system used, the right rate of fertilizer to apply in the following scenarios:
- In the preplant application, while the mulched bed is made for plasticulture vegetables
- As a starter fertilizer for direct-seeded crops like potato, corn, or cotton
- As the amount to inject (fertigation) into the drip irrigation system at any one time
- In a single side-dressing during the growing season for an unmulched crop
- In a single fertigation through the center-pivot irrigation system
Sometimes the right rate to apply at any one time is related to the nutrient involved. For example, in plasticulture vegetables, all of the phosphorus may be applied to the soil while the bed is made. Likewise, a portion of the nitrogen and potassium may be applied while the bed is being made and the remainder applied through the drip irrigation system.
The right timing of nutrients takes into consideration the growth pattern of the crop and, therefore, natural changes in nutrient demand during the season. Crop development begins slowing from seed germination or transplanting, then increases through fruiting, and finally slows down at maturation. This pattern for crop development is referred to as sigmoidal growth (Figure 1). Anticipating changes in growth and nutrient demand is important so that fertilizer application can be timed to meet the needs of growth. A good example of timing of nitrogen and potassium fertilization to meet changes in crop development can be seen for drip-irrigated tomato (Figure 2).
A sigmoidal function—for example, slow crop growth at first, then a zone of rapid increase, followed by attenuation of growth.
Recommendations for injecting N and K2O for mulched, drip-irrigated tomatoes in Florida.
The right timing is often interrelated with the right rate and right placement. For example, as the drip-irrigated tomato crop develops, the rate changes with time so that smaller rates are applied later in the growing season. Greater rates of nutrients are applied at or just before the time when the vegetative growth rate is maximal and fruits are being developed.
Rainfall is difficult to predict; however, when possible, fertilizer application should be timed to minimize the chance of leaching of nutrients due to heavy rainfall.
For maximum nutrient efficiency, nutrients need to be placed where the plant will have the best access to the nutrients. For most crops, the right placement is in the root zone or just ahead of the advancing root system. Most nutrient uptake occurs through the root system, so placing the nutrients in the root zone maximizes the likelihood of absorption by the plant.
Banding and broadcasting are two general approaches to nutrient placement. Banding is the placement of fertilizer in concentrated streams or bands in the soil, typically near the developing plant. Broadcasting is the spreading of fertilizer uniformly over the surface of the soil. Whether to use banding or broadcasting often depends on the type of crop and the development or spread of the root system. Broadcasting is usually most effective either later in the season when roots of a row-crop have explored the space between the rows, or for forage crops that cover the entire soil surface. Fertigation of nitrogen through a center-pivot irrigation system for corn may be a type of fertilizer broadcasting system.
Placement and timing interact because as the crop develops, the root system expands. Placement of fertilizer ahead of the advancing root system for unmulched crops, like potato or cotton, avoids damage to the root system by the fertilizer application equipment. Another example of this interaction would be for fertigation with a pivot irrigation system. The first side-dressings of nitrogen early in the growth cycle for corn may be applied by knifing liquid fertilizer to the side of the row, followed later in the season with applications through the irrigation system. These combinations of timing and placement maximize the likelihood of nitrogen uptake by the plant related to the expansion of the root system.
The tillage system may affect the placement of nutrients. For example, incorporating a nutrient may not be possible in certain minimum tillage systems. In no-till corn production, early nitrogen and phosphorus applications can be made by banding near the seeds with the planter, with later applications of nitrogen by the center-pivot irrigation system.
The right placement is also related to the nutrient in question. For example, phosphorus can become fixed in unavailable forms when it is mixed in with some soils. The main reason P is banded is that it is immobile in the soils and therefore has to be placed nearer to the roots (or the roots have to grow towards the P granule). In sandy loams, P applied to the surface will get adsorbed and can accumulate over time. Accumulations also occur in soils applied with P sourced from organic or manure related amendments. In these situations, banding of the fertilizer reduces, at least temporarily, the mixing of the fertilizer with the soil and increases the chance that phosphorus will remain in a soluble form for root uptake. For example, banding starter-phosphorus may be preferable to broadcasting.
The right placement may also relate to the form of the nutrient source, such as urea nitrogen. Nitrogen from urea may be subject to loss by volatilization when the urea is left on the surface of soil with a high pH. Incorporating the urea or applying a small amount of irrigation to move the urea into the soil helps reduce volatilization losses.
In certain situations and for certain nutrients, foliar applications of fertilizer may be preferred. For example, micronutrients may be more efficiently applied to the foliage for iron or manganese when the soil pH is high.”
Troy stated that 28 percent of Florida’s land is in conservation practices, whether it is through parks or easements. “By giving growers a strong opportunity to engage with the scientists, they can make accurate decisions that can improve their businesses and help to create a sustainable livelihood,” he says.
Share this Post
Lake Okeechobee Brouhaha Heats UpFebruary 19, 2019
How Changes in D.C. Will Impact AgFebruary 18, 2019
Georgia Grape Growers Faced with Fungicide ResistanceFebruary 18, 2019
South Florida’s Water Politics Raising QuestionsFebruary 15, 2019